|
November 18, 2005
Senate and House Property
Tax Study Committee Proposals - UPDATE
On Wednesday, November 16, both the Senate and
House Committees on Property Tax Restructuring amended and
further delineated their proposals altering the way property
taxes are levied in South Carolina. The following is a summary
of both plans as they currently are being presented.
The House Plan
The House Ad Hoc Property Tax Study Committee modified their
plan they adopted last week, and plans to further alter their
plan at their next meeting. Their current proposal does the
following:
1. Eliminates all property taxes on owner occupied homes for the
operational expenses of schools, municipalities, SPDs, and
county governments.
• Taxes levied for current and future bond debt would remain on
homes.
• The plan calls for a constitutional amendment to prevent
future reinstatement of property taxes on owner-occupied homes.
2. Exempts unprepared food from the sales tax completely.
3. Raises the total sales tax to 7%. Unprepared food and
accommodations are exempt from the sales tax increase. Some
sales tax exemptions may be eliminated in order to render the
plan revenue neutral. At its November 16, 2005 meeting the House
Committee voted to sunset all existing sales tax exemptions as
of Fiscal Year 2010. In order for the exemption to remain the
General Assembly would be required to affirmatively reinstate
the exemption. It is likely this issue will be revisited at the
next meeting.
4. Eliminates reassessment on all real property, going to a
“point of sale” system. Reassessment values to go back to their
2000- 2001 values. If the property has been transferred since
2000, the value of the property will be the properties value at
the point of sale.
• Property only reassessed upon transfer or substantial
improvement.
• Spouse to spouse transfers are exempt.
5. Counties will be given the option to recognize improvements
for property taxation one month after a certificate of occupancy
is issued. The county governing body will have the discretion of
when new property will be recognized.
6. The committee voted to put in place a millage cap, however
the details of the cap were not discussed.
7. All school facility financing plans which circumvent the
constitutional debt limit provisions (like the BEST plan) are
eliminated. BEST (Building Equity Sooner for Tomorrow) refers to
a particular school building financing plan in Greenville. Under
these plans a non-profit foundation established by the school
board funds the construction projects. Financing works somewhat
like a mortgage or an installment purchase. Schools are built
and the cost is paid off over time. The buildings are leased by
the non-profit to the school district and an ownership interest
is conveyed to the district each year of the lease. The
non-profit uses its right to payments and its lease to sell
bonds to pay for school construction and renovation.
8. The funds from the sales tax increase would be distributed as
follows:
• In year one funds are replaced dollar for dollar.
• For units of local government, other than schools, a
distribution method based on population is phased in for
subsequent years.
• For school districts, an EFA formula is phased in for
subsequent years.
• No local government entity will receive less than they
received in year 1.
• In order to provide for increase costs of service, an
inflation factor shall be applied to the revenues distributed to
local units of government. Any difference between the growth of
revenues funding the program and the inflation factor utilized
will be provided from the General Fund.
• Any additional revenue generated by the additional 2% sales
tax above the BEA’s estimate will be put into a trust fund. The
trust fund will be used to supplant monies to local government
in years that revenue falls short of the estimate.
The Senate Plan
The Senate Committee adopted the following framework and
continues to refine in weekly meetings:
1. Eliminates all property taxes levied for school operations on
owner-occupied homes, and vehicles. The plan also includes an
income tax credit for renters.
2. Raises the total sales tax to 7%. The accommodations tax will
be subject to the increase. Although it is not completely clear
whether it has been voted upon yet, the Senate is trying to
exempt food from the sales tax completely.
3. The default valuation of property would be based upon “point
of sale” (essentially property values are frozen at the value of
the property at the time it is bought) retroactive to 2004.
Improvements made to property after 2004, however, would be
included in the value. A county could decide to have a different
method of valuation either by county council ordinance or
referendum of the voters. The mechanics of the selection process
are still unclear. The different methods available may be:
• point of sale (default)
• property values could increase by inflation (CPI) plus
population
• property values could increase by CPI
• property would be valued at fair market value (the current
method)
If a county chooses to continue to use an assessment method of
taxation, then no millage increase would be allowed in a year of
reassessment implementation.
4. A millage cap will be placed upon all units of local
government by constitutional amendment. The cap will limit millage rate increases to an inflation factor determined by the
total personal income growth average increase for the previous
three years. Any millage rate increase would require a positive
majority vote.
• The cap could only be exceeded in times of an declared
emergency (hurricane, terrorist attack, etc.)
• For counties and cities the cap could also be exceeded by a
majority vote in a referendum held in November. School districts
would not be allowed to exceed the millage cap.
5. The committee chose not to implement a spending cap.
6. Assessors will be required to receive certification and
training, likely through the Department of Revenue.
7. The plan includes a $125 million reserve in case estimates
from the sales tax are not reached.
August 9, 2005
Property Tax Restructuring
|